PROSECUTE

Prosecution Response

Your Examiner Has Objected.
We Answer Back.

An office action is not a rejection — it is an opening argument. How you respond determines whether your patent emerges with the scope you need or the scope that remains after concessions you didn't have to make. Prism IP's prosecution practice is built on the conviction that every response should strengthen, not just defend.

What Is Patent Prosecution?

The Dialogue That
Defines Your Patent

Patent prosecution is the process of communicating with the Patent Office after filing — responding to examination reports, defending claims against objections, amending where necessary, and arguing where possible. In India, the examination process typically involves one or more office actions before grant or refusal.

The quality of prosecution has a direct impact on the final scope of your patent. Applicants who respond defensively — making unnecessary claim amendments, conceding novelty without argument, accepting examiner positions without challenge — often receive patents that are narrower than they need to be. Prism IP's prosecution philosophy is to push back intelligently on every position that deserves challenge.

Our team brings both technical and legal expertise to every response. Understanding why an examiner has raised an objection — technically, not just formally — is the foundation of an effective reply. We analyse the cited prior art deeply before deciding whether to argue, distinguish, or amend.

01
Office Action Analysis
Deep analysis of the examiner's objections — prior art citations reviewed in full, claim rejections mapped, and the examiner's reasoning assessed for technical and legal accuracy.
02
Response Strategy
For each objection: argue, distinguish, amend, or combine. We decide the optimal response strategy before writing a single word — and we explain the strategy to you before proceeding.
03
Prior Art Rebuttal
Technical arguments prepared against each cited reference — addressing the specific features cited, the gaps in the examiner's analysis, and the distinctions your claims maintain.
04
Claim Amendments
Where amendments are warranted, we draft them to maintain maximum scope — not just to overcome the objection, but to preserve the broadest defensible claim territory.
05
Filing & Follow-Up
Response filed with the Patent Office, examiner hearing scheduled if required, and ongoing management through to grant or appeal.

Our Prosecution Services

Every Stage of
Examination Covered

01
First Examination Report Response

The first office action is the most important — the positions taken here shape the rest of prosecution. We invest the most care in getting the FER response right.

02
Subsequent Office Action Responses

If prosecution continues, we maintain strategic consistency — building on arguments already made rather than abandoning positions without reason.

03
Pre-Grant Opposition Response

Third-party pre-grant oppositions require a different kind of response — we handle both filing and defending opposition proceedings at the Indian Patent Office.

04
Hearing Representation

Where an examiner hearing is required or beneficial, Prism IP represents applicants directly — presenting arguments in person for the most complex objections.

05
Appeal Proceedings

If examination reaches an impasse, we manage appeals to the Intellectual Property Appellate Board — with the same technical and legal depth that characterises our prosecution practice.

06
Foreign Prosecution Coordination

For international portfolios, we coordinate prosecution strategy across jurisdictions — ensuring consistent claim scope and avoiding damaging prosecution history estoppel.

Get Started

Received an
Office Action?

Share the examination report and your application. We'll analyse it and tell you exactly what the right response strategy is — before the deadline becomes a problem.

Request Prosecution Support
Prismy
Prism IP · AI Assistant

Hi, I'm Prismy

Ask me anything about patents, trademarks, IP strategy, or what Prism IP can do for you.